- Home /

In my program Math in Your Feet (
www.mathinyourfeet.com) elementary students use "movement variables" to help make up their percussive dance patterns. These movement variables are actually a collection of attributes (5-6 options in each of the follwoing 3 categories: foot position, type of movement, and direction). I'm wondering if using variables/attributes like this in a systematic way (like how you go about determining combinations, for instance) makes it more mathematical? Or is it simply that when you are working to solve a problem (like making a dance step) you manipulate the variables/attributes to suit your aesthetic or needs, with one or many possible agreeable solutions? Let me know if I should clarify this further. :-)

Comment

MobySnoodles

**Answer** by MobySnoodles
·
May 18, 2013 at 11:56 AM

There is a certain tension here between free and open math exploration - and being systematic. I want the two to be balanced. I want kids to play with variables freely, trying this and that. I also want them to notice patterns in what they try, then explain patterns, then try things more systematically based on patterns. Both are math activities! Different people have different personal preferences, too. I hear Einstein played a lot before, during and after working systematically. ![alt text][1] [1]: /storage/temp/22-einsteinteasing.jpeg

einsteinteasing.jpeg
(20.0 kB)

How do you transition from playing math to more formal math activities/lessons? 4 Answers

When does the word variable related to/not related to algebra? 1 Answer

Is 2.5 years too young for a math lesson? 4 Answers

Can math help understand disease? 0 Answers

How can we help young students to know learning mathematics is more than just getting the answer? 3 Answers

Copyright © 2010-16 DZone, Inc. - All rights reserved.