Read past issues | Visit the course page | Follow Moebius Noodles on Facebook

Time flies when you do math! Our open online course Problem Solving for the Young, the Very Young and the Young at Heart is almost over.  This is the final issue of the course newsletter.

Thank you!

To everyone who signed up: thank you! When we planned this course, we thought we’d have a dozen families and groups.  We got seven times as many! Which tells us there is a need and a desire for this sort of math.

To everyone who did at least one task: THANK YOU VERY MUCH! We got great stories for the book, and good data for the citizen science project (see Lessons Learned section below). The best part: the course invited many kids all around the world to try a Math Circle experience with parents and friends!

What’s next?

Now that you’ve tried mathematical problem solving with your children, will you continue? If yes, we would love to support you. Here’s what you can do:

• Ask questions and share your experiences on our Ask platform. It is open to you and every question gets an answer!
•  Schedule a live Q&A session for your group of friends or a Math Circle. Contact us to arrange date/time.
• Write to us at moby@moebiusnoodles.com to let us know how we can help you.
• Sign up for the next open mini-course with us. We will run it in a few weeks. The details of the course and other such news will appear in our regular Moebius Noodles newsletter, which the course participants will receive twice a month.
• Continue running Math Circles.  The National Association of Math Circles grants $2000 to support new Circles in the US. The application form is just a couple of pages – very doable! The deadlines are September 1 and February 1: https://www.mathcircles.org/content/math-circle-grants

If you are wondering what’s next for us, we will continue working on the draft of the Problem Solving book. We will write regular updates about our progress.

Now for some Lessons Learned. We would love to hear yours!

Lessons learned: on running courses like this

• The beginning voice conversation (initial interview) helps to share math values and to get to know one another. But video processing and scheduling is about ten times more work than we expected. We will use different software; do it in groups; and meet after participants have looked at the first assignments, to answer questions.
• We need smaller assignments, and fewer. For our next course, we’re thinking of one problem per week, not three “do it” problems plus three “plan it” problems.
• Participants wanted more discussions and collaboration. We need more tools and assignments for social mixing.
• Many people asked for live group events. We’ll have that in the future.
• We need to provide optional know-how (reading, videos) on getting started and addressing typical difficulties. Several people in this course made handouts, which we will include in the book and adapt for future courses.

Lessons learned: citizen science study pilot

There is a lot of education research on some of these items, such as the use of symbol and signs. Why do we want more studies? Because the context matters. We need to see how things work in the context of small groups and families. That context isn’t studied much at all.

• Data collection worked. We got a good preliminary data set on dimensions of adaptation. We need more scaffolding to invite people for data analysis.
• Toys and manipulatives help young or hesitant students to get started, and add diversion and width to the experience. Toys easily lead kids into open exploration or free play (which may be good), and away from goal-oriented activities (which may be bad). Using whole bodies to physically enact the problem works differently from using just toys.
• Stories, in words or visuals, make or break problems for a significant number of kids. Some people had recurring characters, settings, and themes in their stories, which helps to focus on math (since the context is already familiar). 
• Computer tools seem to be more generic, in that they don’t require problem adaptation or preparation as much as physical manipulatives. This is different from using topic-specific computer games, such as Free Flow (spatial connections) or DragonBox (equations).
• Many people reported kids getting frustrated, and then dealing with frustrations, or taking a break. Causes and remedies need more study.
• We need some scaffolds and advice on how to collect data. For example, running a Math Circle with more than a couple of young kids and taking pictures or notes takes two people, not one.
• “It’s funny how our meeting turned into math club for the parents by the end!” And: “Are they spectators or facilitators? If they are to help, how might they do so? Do all parents need to be on board with the lesson plan and goals?” One type of adaptation is to focus on parents and their interests. For example, working with math-phobic friends: “She confided that she had had nightmares the previous night about not being able to do the problems.”
• Symbols and signs (for example, for directions in the gear problem) is a big dimension of adaptation. So is helping kids come up with their own terms, and to use these unconventional terms consistently.
• The very fact of adapting problems bothers some kids as “cheating.” We need to address that, maybe by inviting kids to be citizen scientists too, instead of “just students.
• How do you make problems more open-ended? James Tanton has a lot of advice. So do all those kids who followed rabbit trails all over the place!

Thank you for promoting meaningful, beautiful, playful math! See you online!